|
11th June 2023 Sunday evening is here again and that means some gaming goodness on Board Game Arena. Line up those numerical cards in this abstract, lightweight and compact set-collecting card game! Caveat: We've only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
There's no artwork to speak of in Line-it other than some abstract shading. It does however make good use of bright, brash colours which looks fairly eye-catching. Again, there's also no iconography to speak of in Line-it other than some numbers. Players will have no trouble understanding the game. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Line-it, players will be drafting cards then using them to create a row of cards (The titular line if you will) and this row must either ascend of descend numerically from left-to-right. Once a line reaches a 'suitable' size, players can then choose score that line by 'completing' and adding it to their personal 'scoring stack' which represents their victory points (VPs). A round in Line-it is played using a traditional turn order with the first player acting before play progresses to the player on their left and so on.
Endgame The endgame is triggered when there are not enough cards to create a full market at the start of a round. Then the following occurs. Firstly, any remaining cards from the deck are placed on to their corresponding jackpot tokens. Then in turn order, each player gets the opportunity to play 1 card from their hand to their line (Increasing their score and potentially gaining a jackpot.). Finally, all players must complete their current line. Now players calculate their finishing scores. Each card in a scoring stack is worth 1 VP while bet tokens are worth their displayed values. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Line-it is an abstract drafting game that doesn't attempt to awkwardly shoehorn a tenuous theme on to itself and while I know plenty of players for whom theme is important, I myself have never found the lack of it an obstacle to enjoying a game. In this regard, some people may be put off by Line-it's lack of theme but YMMV. Rules-wise, Line-it is a straightforward, easily understood rules-light but luck-heavy game. Players have to draft a card and then choose whether to play it to their line or 'bank' it to play later. Players will initially look to draft a very low or high card to start a line, giving them the most leeway to create longer lines and players will want to create long lines. The game's action economy dictates that (Ignoring jackpots.) completing a line after 6 drafts will score 3VPs - which is 0.5VPs per action but completing a line with just 4 cards would score 1VPs and that works out to be only 0.25 per action. Worse of all, having to complete a line of 3 or less cards would give 0VPs for per action. Something players will definitely want to avoid. Because of the inherent luck present in Line-it, at times players will have to deal with much less than optimal choices while drafting cards - doubly so when a player is going later in the round and their choices lessen even more. Of course jackpots throw something different into the mix, sometimes justifying completing a line 'early' to gain those bonus cards. E.G., discarding a line of 3 yellows to gain a yellow jackpot card would earn 1VP which works to be .33VP per action. Having said that, getting 3 cards of the same colour will not be particularly quick, especially if other players can get there quicker. Bet cards also provide a extra element to think about. Although their usefulness will vary: They can be a good source of VPs in the early game or early in a player's line but conversely be very negative in the late game or of if added later in a players line. Players will need to think carefully when considering the risk of adding a bet card to their line. The other element for players to consider is placing a card into their hand. Being able to bank a card can be vital to success. There's a bit of higher level of play in Line-it that can come from storing and playing a card of a certain colour or value can prove advantageous at the right time and sometimes. Additionally, a player being able to put a card into their hand simply to just to avoid playing it can also be useful. Wisely, the game limits player hands to 2, otherwise it would be too useful an action. So while Line-it does give players meaningful decisions to make, the can also be very luck dependant and sometimes players will be faced with nothing but less than optimal choices, particularly when they go later in the turn order and their options dwindle. The scoring also felt somewhat frustrating, having to discard 3 cards before scoring feels wrong. I know why that mechanic exists - it prevents players scoring short lines of 2 cards or so which is not something you want in a game about creating numerically linear lines of card. Even so, it felt counterintuitive and even unfair! Another element I found counterintuitive was when I would habitually think, 'I'm going first next round, so I'll draft one of those cards not taken this round' only to see them discarded into their jackpot stacks. I know this is my fault but again, it felt frustrating and only served to highlight the game's randomness. I'm probably overthinking it though. Line-it is an accessible game that will probably play quite well with non-gamers. It's also a quick filler game that could be used to begin or end a long gaming session and not something to pour huge amounts of though into. If you like a lot of luck in your filler games, Line-it could be for you. For me though, it didn't have quite enough to engage me. I applaud a game for it's simplicity and accessibility but having said that, I did find Line-it just a bit too simple and random for my liking.
0 Comments
30th May 2023 It's a Tuesday evening again and that means it's time for some gaming goodness with the Woking Gaming Club at The Sovereigns. Bandido is a wily one!. The sly criminal has finally been caught and sent to jail. But Bandido is never one to rest and soon has found a way to dig tunnels out of his cell. Can the players manage to coordinate in this cooperative card-laying game to stop Bandido escaping? What's in a game?
There's not much to say about Bandido's minimal components. The starting tile is notably thick and chunky in contrast to the cards which feel a touch flimsy - possibly due to their unusual proportion. This is not an issue though and unless the cards are mistreated they will be fine. Bandido's artwork is equally minimal, there's a touch of stylised art for Bandido himself and well.... that's pretty much it other than the illustration representing dead-ends and the tunnels themselves. You could argue that the hand holding the flashlight is an icon, otherwise there's no iconography in the game. Everything is instantly understandable. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Bandido, players are cooperatively trying to stop Bandido from escaping by playing cards to block off all tunnels. The game uses a traditional turn order with the active player resolving their turn before play progresses to the player on their left. A turn plays out as detailed below.
Endgame Play continues until 1 of the 2 following conditions are met. If the deck becomes depleted and none of the players have any cards left to play and there is at least 1 un-blocked off tunnel, then Bandido manages to escape! The player collectively lose. If on the other hand, the players manage to block off all tunnels at any point during the game, then Bandido is trapped. The players immediately and collectively win! Overall
Bandido's theme is sort of stuck-on and perhaps a little offbeat (I mean stopping the titular character escaping!) but it fits the game well enough and will be understood by all players. Whilst the game's rules light, don't be fooled by this simplicity. Bandido is quite a hard game to win. This is especially true when playing at a higher player count. In a solo game, the player will know exactly which cards are available but with 3 companions, it becomes much harder to predict. (One criticism I have of Bandido is that as the tunnel network invariably grows, it may expand in unexpected ways - more than once we've had to shift the entire map because it was going off a table edge - which is a fairly fiddly affair.) There is without a doubt also a degree of luck involved (As is the case with most cooperative games.) which may not appeal to all players but there's also a good chunk of having to think ahead and trying optimise how cards are played. It's hard to resist the urge to play dead-end cards that close tunnels down in the early game but it can be vital that you don't always do this. Management of 'moving' tunnels around the playing area is key to success. E.g., directing tunnels towards each other and connecting them can create 'loops' which essentially closes both. Additionally looping 2 tunnels into 1 then closing it off is equally useful. There are only a limited amount of dead-end cards and using them up too early means they won't be available to use in the late game. It's something players must plan for. Players must also make sure they don't create any situations with card positioning which will render a tunnel impossible to close. Because Bandido is so straightforward, with a easily recognisable goal and accessibility, it's a great game for all the family, more causal players and younger players and can prove a lot of fun. That this is a cooperative game is even better, many cooperative games have intricate systems that must be managed in order to make them work, which not the case here. It's definitely worth trying. 30th April 2023 Sunday is here again and we're logged into Board Game Arena for some gaming goodness. Gizmos not about some cute puppet that spawns a legion of malignant sprites, instead it's drafting and engine building game about building gizmos.... through the power of science! Caveat: We've only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
Gizmos' only art appears on the gizmo cards and although it seems quite small, it is varied and detailed, appropriately depicting various scientific activities in bright colours. In fact Gizmos makes good use of bright colour throughout on iconography and components. With regards to iconography, there is a fair amount of it but for the most, it's intuitive and easily understood, some of it however, will have players looking up the rules, especially regarding the picking and drawing of resources. How's it play? Setup
On to play Players are attempting to accumulate VPs in Gizmos and they come from 2 sources, the cards and by acquiring VP tokens. This is done by drafting resources and cards, then building cards to gain cards and resources at faster rate to build more cards and so on! Gizmos uses a typical turn order with the active player taking their action before play progresses to the player on their left.
Endgame Play continues until one player has built a total of 16 gizmo cards OR built 3 level 3 cards. In either case, play continues until all players have had equal turns. Then players total their VPs from the cards they've built and any VP tokens they've acquired. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Gizmos' theme about building gizmos for a science fair is fairly light and perhaps a little unexciting but appropriate. It's also a game that's all about building an engine to trigger combos. Players will look to find the most effective and efficient way to pick energy and build gizmos through upgrades, arguably the 2 most important actions in the game: Although it's probably not a good idea to neglect upgrading other stats or actions. Increasing energy storage and conversion is especially useful as it allows the player to manage their energy resources with greater flexibility and in fact, some gizmo cards require 6 energy to build! - Forcing players to upgrade their maximum storage. A lot of the decision making this will involve will be contextual, depending on how energy resources appear and are drafted by other players. As always in these situations, players will need to adapt to circumstances (Which is why energy conversion and storage is so useful.). The same is also true of gizmo cards. This can lead to some unusual combos appearing. Gizmos other 2 actions, file and research feel a little surplus to need and maybe just pad the game out unnecessarily a bit. There's a higher level of play regarding the file action that involves watching opponents, seeing which energy resources they are going for, anticipating what gizmo card they might be aiming for and hate drafting that gizmo with a denial strategy but conversely. However, those other players will probably archive cards they want to build before beginning to accumulate the energy requires which sort of makes attempting to hate draft moot. Research also feels less useful, essentially when researching, the player is making a bit of Hail Mary play, hoping to find a gizmo card that matches the energy tokens they possess but for whatever reason cannot use to build a currently available gizmo card. These are minor drawbacks though and players are generally not required to use them. Otherwise, Gizmos is a fairly solid engine-building game with a slice of drafting. It hits a pleasant sweet spot of blending fairly straightforward rules that are fairly quick to learn with hefty and frequently meaningful decisions to make. Worth trying if you like this kind of game. 25th April 2023 Tuesday is here again and we're with the Woking Gaming Club and The Sovereigns for a evening of gaming goodness. Pirates; - they're known for spending their time burying treasure and going arrr! Skull King is a trick-taking game all about finding that treasure and going ahhh! What's in a game?
The quality of the cards is exactly the kind of quality you'd expect from a modern game - so pretty good, fairly sturdy cards that look laminated. There's lots of nice pirate themed artwork in Skull King. Most of it is bright and colourful with good quality illustrations. Importantly, the 4 suits all look distinct from one another as do the special/character cards. The 4 suits are easily recognised by theme and colours. The special cards are also easily recognisable. How's it play? Setup
On to play Skull King is played over 10 rounds with players having increasingly larger hands of cards as rounds progress. Furthermore, as the game progresses, players will play more and more tricks. Whoever wins each trick will earn the cards used in that trick - which will equate to points at the end of the round. Skull King is a pretty traditional trick-taking game which uses a traditional turn order with the active player acting before play progresses to the player on their left.
Endgame Once the 10th round has concluded and the VPs for that round calculated, the game is finally at an end and goes to end scoring. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Despite being a bit of a stretch to fit, Skull King's pirate theme is fairly amusing with evocative artwork to match. It's a good looking game. Mechanically, the game is for the most part a straightforward, familiar trick-taking card game, albeit with a handful of special cards that change things up a little. What makes Skull King standout are the scoring mechanics and in particular the bidding mechanic. Players are forced to make a decision based on contextual information such as what is the current round and what cards they currently have in their hand. Then they'll need to try and gauge how many wins and losses they can get from their hand and plan accordingly. Sometimes this will be simple, in the 1st round with only 1 trick being played, it's fairly safe to bid on winning 0 tricks, especially if a player only has a escape card in their hand! As the game progresses though, these decisions will get harder and harder as more and more cards, special and otherwise come into play, making longer rounds a bit more unpredictable. Additionally, the scoring system for bids rewards players who bid high (And manage to achieve it!) while it increases the price for failing big. A genuine risk and reward mechanic. Finally, the bidding mechanic also introduces asymmetrical objective for players, some will be looking win tricks when others are trying lose them. There's also a higher level of play here that involves paying attention to other players' bids. E.g., if an opponent has won all the tricks they bid for and the round isn't over, making them win a trick will scupper the points they get from their bid. However, I'm not so sure how I feel about the bidding mechanic, it definitely adds an extra layer to the gameplay but it's also kind of swingy, hitting a bid can earn a lot of VPs while missing it can lose a not insignificant number of VPs and sometimes this will be very much out a players control. Additionally. the scoring rules feel a bit overly complex and fiddly, this compounded by how the game is played over 10 rounds and needs to be scored 10 times. This brings to my other criticism which is the game feels too long: By my calculations, a total of 55 tricks will be played over the 10 rounds which doesn't seem too bad but actually means shuffling and dealing 10 times as well as scoring 10 times and that all adds up to make the game feel a bit overlong and also finicky. Skull Kings is a (Completely acceptable.) average trick-taking experience that is enjoyable enough but is mired down by excess bookkeeping for a card game. It's not a bad choice for a game I feel its unique elements don't do enough to make the game differentiate itself from the crowd. The pirate theme will appeal to some but wouldn't be my first choice for a trick-taking game. 16th April 2023 It's a Sunday and we're logged into Board Game Arena for more gaming fun. Take on the role of Perseus, Jason or Hercules. Battle The Hydra, vanquish The Gorgon and defeat Cerberus in Legends of Hellas, a cooperative card game of Greek heroes and Greek mythology. Caveat: We've only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
With a chunky, cartoony style, Legends of Hellas is a bright and colourful looking game. It's crisp, clear artwork and the monsters on the monster cards are all instantly recognisable. I think it looks great. There's half a dozen icons in the game and they're only used in reference between action and monster cards. Players should have no problems here. How's it play? Setup Legends of Hellas presents players with 12 different missions to undertake which may have some varying setup and game rules. However, broadly speaking, they share a common theme - which defeating monsters until the boss monster 'the chimera' appears then defeating it.
On to play Players in Legends of Hellas are cooperatively attempting to defeat a number of monsters inspired by Greek mythology. This is done by playing cards but players will also need to perform other actions to facilitate this. Legends of Hellas uses a traditional turn order with active player completing their action before play progresses to the next player.
Endgame If the players manage to defeat the Chimera once it has appeared, then they collectively win the game! If however, at any time a player needs to draw cards and there are none left in the action deck, then the players collectively lose the game. Overall
Between it's bold colourful presentation of Greek mythology and card mechanics which will have heroes travelling about to battle monsters using their guile, strength and so on; Legends of Hellas is pretty strong thematically. I personally like how The Chimera will be a random amalgam of 2 other monsters. Mechanically, on the surface it's a pretty straightforward game - play cards with symbols matching symbols on monster cards to defeat them but in practice, Legends of Hellas is quite unforgiving. This is because players aren't really battling the monsters, they're battling the action deck - or more precisely, fighting to stop the deck running out and luck can play a very big part here. Every choice and action a player takes - not just attacking monsters - will cost a card. Draw cards - one of them must be discarded. Give cards to an alley - one must be discarded. Move or view the deck - you get the idea. Even deciding which cards to discard is also an important decision. I.e., if none of the current monsters require a certain type of card, is that type safe to discard? A monster requiring it might turn up later Consequently it can be very easy to run out of cards, players will need to try and play as efficiently as possible with minimal squandering and no frivolous moves. Judicious use of divine interventions can be critical here, playing one at the right time can defeat a monster with only 3 cards instead of 5. It might not seem like a saving of many cards but it can be. While players can not explicitly discuss the cards in their hand, they will need to coordinate actions, especially actions such as passing cards to each other and viewing the deck. Being a cooperative game, there's also a degree of luck in Legends of Hellas, perhaps a little too much like for my liking. Sometimes players will draw a hand of cards they just can't use and will have to find a way to adapt. Conversely, sometimes luck will deliver the exact cards you will need which will make it easier and maybe a little unsatisfying. It also means that sometimes it felt like my decisions had been taken out my hands by chance and sometimes it felt like any strategy I had was was reduced to simply 'play what you have' and adapt to 'what you get'. Despite this I found Legends of Hellas to be a fairly enjoyable experience mixed with dollop of frustration from the luck which strangely, could go 2 ways; too much bad luck or too much good luck! With it's cartoonish art style and somewhat lightweight rules, Legends of Hellas would appear to be aimed at a family audience but we found it actually quite a tricky game, I'm not sure younger players will have a easy time. however a bit of adult/parent contribution would make a difference, I guess that's what makes it a family game. If you want a ancient Greece themed cooperative game or in fact any kind of low maintenance cooperative game, Legends of Hellas might fill the bill. 9th April 2023 Sunday is here again and we're logged into Board Game Arena for some gaming fun. 'Triiiiooo, triiiio I want a trio, And I want now.' I'm showing my age here, but this is not a game about a chocolatey biscuit, instead it's a set collecting card game. Furthermore, Trio is apparently a reskin of a game called Nana, which disappointingly, is not about collecting grannies. Caveat: We have only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
Trio features cards decorated with quirky little monochrome illustrations with what appears to be a Mexican day of the dead theme? These illustrations are set against colourful backgrounds which are associated with each of the 12 differently valued cards. I'm not sure how the them ties with the game but the cards definitely look colourful, dynamic and eye catching. Cards are numbered 1-12, there's no other iconography. This is all very easily understood. How's it play? Setup
On to play There are three ways (A trio!) (SIC) to win Trio. Each involves revealing cards to collect sets of identical values. Trio follows the typical turn order with the active player taking their turn before play progress to the player on their left. During their turn, the active player may reveal up to 3 cards by performing the following actions.
Endgame There are 3 ways a player may Trio.
Overall
Trio's has a fairly abstract theme but to be fair I don't it detracts from what is a fairly accessible game. In fact, Trio is such a straightforward game that almost has nothing to write about. It mixes simple deduction and memory mechanics. Players will want to remember what cards are revealed and where they are revealed from, allowing them to create sets of 3. Players can also glean information from what their opponents reveal, either from their own questions of those of others. E.g., if someone is asked to reveal their highest card and it's an 8, then it's obvious they wont have cards of higher values. This is useful when deciding which sets to try and work towards. There's also something mechanically interesting going on with the game's probabilities. Generally, players should look to collect sets of either the highest or lowest value sets - simply by virtue of being able to only reveal the highest and lowest value cards of opponents. This is why collecting the 7's insta-wins the game, because the 7's will likely be in the middle of players' hands and will be harder to collect This becomes even more likely in games with lower player counts as each player will have bigger hand sizes. Conversely the distribution of cards will be less even in games with a higher player count, making it a little more unpredictable. Talking of player count, we played with 3 players and I felt it was a little underwhelming. Trio can play with up to 6, I think the game improves with more players and the greater unpredictability adds to the experience. We also played online which I feel detracts from a game like this which benefits from interaction between players. Trio is obviously a lightweight game and will have crossover appeal to families and more casual gamers, it's set collecting, memory-based gameplay is something most people will be familiar with to some degree or other. I that's something that might appeal, them Trio is worth a look. I would say it might be a bit too simple for seasoned games but truthfully, I think can serve as a filler game or an ender for the night. It's something I would like to try with the physical version at a higher player count. 21st February 2023 Tuesday evening again! We're with the Woking Gaming Club at The Sovereigns again for some more gaming goodness. Durian: The durian is the edible fruit of several tree species belonging to the genus Durio*. Durian is also game about a very, very angry gorilla who runs a jungle fruit shop, worse than that - he's your boss in this push your luck card game about managing inventory and stock. *According to Wikipedia What's in a game?
Being exceptionally long, the cards feel a little flimsy but unless they are treated badly, it shouldn't be an issue. The order board tile and point tokens are made of suitability sturdy card, while the card holders are wooden and I always approve of wooden components. The bell works well enough but feels a little delicate but again, unless you treat it badly, it shouldn't be a problem and while it's a unnecessary component it's a welcome addition. I've never been one to resist gimmicks! There's a small amount artwork utilised for the siblings and the different fruits which is quite stylised and cartoonish. It all looks good enough, the gorillas look a little abstract but the fruits look suitably distinct from each other both in colour and shape Nearly all of the small amount of iconography used in Durian is straightforward. The 4 fruits are easily understood and differentiated from each other. The 3 sibling cards all have their own unique icons, which despite being fairy obvious will likely have players reaching for the rule book since they appear so infrequently during the game, which - as explained below is not necessarily a good thing. How's it play? Setup
On to play Durian is a bit of a curious beast where players are looking to see if the game has 'gone bust' using 'imperfect knowledge'. The game uses a traditional turn order with the active player taking their turn before play progresses to the player on their left. Before discussing the rules, it's worth stating that the deck of cards serve both as shop inventory and customer orders. Additionally, the gorilla sibling cards have different functions depending on whether they appear in the inventory or order.
Endgame The game ends when a player has acquired 7 or more points worth of point tokens. This could from the final 7 point token or a combination of lower valaue point tokens. Points are tallied, lowest score wins. Overall
Thematically, Durian could have been almost anything and gorillas running a fruit shop is as good as any, so why not, it suits the game's light nature. Mechanically. there are a couple of interesting things going on. Firstly, the way the game employs 'imperfect knowledge' is pretty good. Players will spend their time watching the behaviour of other players, seeing how they play the cards they draw and trying to deduct what is on their own card. For example: if another players decides to play a card which adds bananas to the order and you can see no bananas on anyone else's inventory cards, then it's generally safe to assume that you're the one with bananas on their inventory card! Of course, the gorilla cards can occasionally appear in the inventory and throw a spanner into the works. In the above example, the infinite bananas card could change everything. There's a weird drawback to the rules here though; since the gorilla cards appear fairly infrequently in the inventory. Players won't remember their rules and will ask to look at the rules - it's a clear tell that a gorilla card has been thrown into the mix. Gorilla cards can also have a big impact on orders. Allowing an order card to be changed round can cause the order to 'go bust' or vice versa. I will add that the rules feel a little counterintuitive here. In most games, going bust is a bad thing but in Durian it can be a good thing. Ringing the bell at the right time both prevents you getting points and also inflicts them on other players. This brings me to the mechanics for scoring. Escalating points works very well here and mostly keeps the stakes high until the game end. Mathematically, a game will last at least 3 rounds. If a single player gets 1+2+4 (or some other combination.) that will end the game. Since, as the game progresses the points given out will increase, it's entirely possible that if a game gets to 7 rounds, a player who was on '0' points may get '7' points, end the game and come last! This is especially so in games with a higher player count (Durian plays up to 7.). Because the scoring is about giving other players what are essentially negative points, usually at this point I'd criticise Durian for being well... negative but since the game is quick playing and light-hearted I don't feel an issue here. Durian is a mechanically lightweight game with for the most part only a single decision to make - ring the bell or not. Where it's depth comes from is in how to get to that decision. Players cannot afford to not pay attention during their opponents' turns, gleaning information from what moves they are making is vital to the decisions a player needs to make when it's their turn. This is one of those games that's as much about playing the players as playing the game. I found Durian an enjoyable game with a sometimes agonising central decision to make and this is good thing as it makes that decision meaningful, which is what I look for in a game. Durian is a bit of party game that also works as a filler. It's style and humorous theme fits it's quick unpredictable gameplay well. It's not a game to take too seriously. If this is what you're looking for, give Durian a try. 12th February It's a Sunday afternoon and we're at The Dice Tower in Basingstoke For Ares' birthday party. So finally... Cards Against Humanity: the blog post. Cards Against Humanity has garnered a reputation for being wry, almost satirical humour and capacity to be outrageous. So is this game offensive and by offensive, I mean does it offend my sensibilities regarding well balanced and sharply honed gameplay... well read on. What's in a game?
The cards are average thickness but seem plastic or vinyl coated and feel reasonably sturdy - they need to be for a party game. There's no art in Cards Against Humanity. Unless you count white text on a black background and vice versa. Again, there's no iconography in Cards Against Humanity as the game is entirely drive by text. Wow, so far this blog has written itself! How's it play?
On to play The objective in Cards Against Humanity is to earn 'Awesome Points' which are just victory points (VPs). This is done by answering the questions on the black cards in the most entertaining way, which can be funny, outrageous, offensive and probably even worse! Each player's turn consists of 4 phases.
Endgame I always thought that Cards Against Humanity concluded after the 10th black card was won but after skimming the rules, this doesn't seem to be the case and there are several different ways the game could end. Regardless of this, whenever the game reaches whatever its game ending criteria is, the game ends and Awesome Points are calculated Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
First of all I'll say; it's sort of pointless to blog about Cards Against Humanity and discuss mechanics or strategies or theme in the way I would normally and that's because it's the epitome of a party game, albeit a very much adult themed one. That means it's loud and raucously humorous, easy to learn and easy to play. No one really cares about VPs or who wins and yes, it's also potentially offensive. Suffice to say that if you're thin-skinned or easily offended, Cards Against Humanity is probably not for you. The real question is: Is it fun? I'm going to say, yes and sometimes very much so. Obviously, much of the game's pleasure derives from the kind of people playing it. I imagine it's a game that gets a lot of play by drunk participants - there's a good reason why the cards are fairly sturdy. If you're concerned about anything other than basically cracking jokes, probably best to look elsewhere. Personally, I thoroughly enjoy the challenge of trying to craft the most outrageous answers and listening to other players' answers. I also think most people playing it understand it's just humour doing what humour does very well, which is bringing up stuff that would never be broached in conversation otherwise. There is a caveat here though: Which is Cards Against Humanity can definitely outstay its welcome. Initially, we played several times with the 10 black card limit and when that was reached, someone would invariably say: 'Why don't we play through all the black cards.' The first time was: 'Yeah, cool'. The second time: 'Oh Okay.' The third time: I had to stifle an inward groan. So if you want a shockingly funny and outrageous party game, Cards Against Humanity would be a good choice. Just play it short intense bursts. 28th January 2023 Wogglecon 6, a day of gaming at the Bisley Scout Hall continues and the next game of the day is Skulk Hollow. I didn't know that it turns out that little anthropomorphic fox dudes and giant stone creatures seem to really hate each: Which is what Skulk Hollow is all about in this asymmetrical strategy game! What's in a game? Skulk Hollow is a 2-player game where one player takes on the role of a 'Foxen' hero who leads a band of Foxen warriors against a lone guardian who is a literal colossal stony force of nature. Each player has their own unique decks, components and gameplay.
The tokens and meeples all feel solid and look great. Obviously the massive guardian meeple is the notable standout component, yes, perhaps you could call it a gimmick but it fits thematically. The use of card boxes is a nice touch of presentation. The art is equally high quality. Skulk Hollow uses a coloured line illustration somewhat cartoonish style that's colourful, bright, detailed and suits the games slight whimsical (At least as whimsical as 2 factions battling each other can get!) nature. I've found that anthropomorphic art can be divisive as a style but I think the anthropomorphic character art on card looks pretty good regardless of what your stance is. The game board also looks great and I like how compact it is. With regards to iconography, Skulk Hollow uses fair amount but it all seems pretty self-explanatory. Icons for movement are easily understood, as are the icons for actions such melee, leap, etc. I don't imagine players having any problem understanding the game. How's it play? Setup
On to play Being a 2-player game, Skulk Hollow uses a very traditional turn order with one player completing their turn before play moves over to their opponent and continues alternating between them for the entirety of the game. Additionally, the Foxen hero player always starts. During their turn, the player will have a number of actions points (AP) available to them which is determined by which Foxen hero/guardian they chose, although typically this is 2-3 APs.
Endgame There are 3 ways the game end can be triggered.
Overall
Skulk Hollow has asymmetrical and card driven gameplay which presents players with some challenging, meaningful choices and options. Players will instinctively want to play cards with maximum efficiency to inflict maximum damage but sometimes because of their hand of cards, players won't be guaranteed having the card to make the move they they need and they'll be forced to adapt. This can be a little frustrating but also makes hand management quite important, sure a player can use a strong card now but sometimes it's worth keeping hold of it for perhaps a more effective use in a later round. It should be mentioned that some of the guardians have smaller hand sizes, meaning they are trickier to play. Of course, players will also want to watch their opponents, paying attention to which cards they play and when. - There's a bit of higher level play here about tracking opponent's actions, essentially a bit of card counting. Otherwise it's quite tricky to describe gameplay; with 4 Foxen leaders and 4 guardians, the various combinations will at least to some extent dictate player tactics - as will the actions of opponents. Skulk Hollow feels like it's about playing the player as much as playing the game. Finally; Skulk Hollow is a 2-player game and I'm always a bit wary of 2-player games as they can revert to a traditional 1-on-1 directly confrontational game, this is definitely the case with Skulk Hollow. While the game is not particularly chess-like, with moving pieces about a board to eliminate your opponent, it does provide something of a chess-like experience and to be honest, it's a playstyle that I'm not personally overly enamoured with. Your mileage will of course vary. Having said all of that; I like to think that I can recognise a well crafted game when I play one and that's what I think this is. Thematically, Skulk Hollow is quite strong. The 'numerous weaker units vs a single giant enemy' gameplay draws inspiration from some classic older games. While, with its climbing on to, running around and stabbing bits of a colossal monster, it's undeniable that Skulk Hollow also takes some thematic inspiration from a certain videogame and it makes for a entertaining concept to add to a board game. It adds up to an interesting game, both visually and mechanically. it is a mid-weight, asymmetrical game that features a lot of player interaction and conflict with moderate tactics and touch of luck. The various combinations of the 2 battling factions also provides a fair bit of replayability. If you want a 2-player game with those elements, Skulk Hollow is worth a look. 28th January 2023 Our day of gaming with The Woking Gaming Club at Wogglecon 6 continued with Ligretto. I don't know what Ligretto is meant to mean but it gets shouted a lot when playing this real-time, abstract card game. It's time to begin the blog so without any further ado... LIGRETTO! What's in a game? There are 3 versions of Ligretto; red, green and blue. They are functionally identical except for the backs, which indicate which decks they are and which set they come from. A single set of Ligretto is enough for 4 players, having all 3 sets means there's enough for 12 players!
The cards are the standard quality you'd expect for a modern game. Ligretto makes great use of colour, the 4 colours are all bright, vibrant and distinctive. Otherwise, there's no illustrations and minimal art for Ligretto, just some detailing. This is by no means a bad thing. Ligretto is an abstract game, trying to fit a theme to it would just feel like shoehorning. I do have one small criticism that is directed at the backs of the cards which could have have been more distinct from each other. Ligretto also has no iconography other than numbers, players will have no trouble understanding the game. How's it play? Setup
On to play Ligretto is played simultaneously by all players in real time which means there are no turns or any turn structure. The purpose is to play as many cards as possible (An as quickly as possible.) before the round end is triggered, which occurs when any player's Ligretto stack is emptied. How is this done - read on.
Endgame As soon as any player has scored 99 or more points at the end of a round, the game ends. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Speed and reflexes drive gameplay in Ligretto. The objective is pretty simple - play as many cards as possible while emptying the Ligretto stack. Not only will players have to pay attention for opportunities to play cards, they'll also want to think ahead. Canny players will keep a sharp eye out for stacks which are 2 numbers lower than cards they want to play so that as soon as an opponent adds a card to that stack, they can immediately add to it themselves. As a rule, I'm wary of dexterity, reflex or reaction based games and to be honest, it's not why I like or play board games. In fact, I like board games because they generally do away with those elements. Which brings me to Ligretto; a real-time, twitch game. This should irk me but because this is essentially a party game and not to be taken seriously, the relative simplicity of the gameplay and brisk playtime prevent it being frustrating. Ligretto is a fun filler game and its light touch can provide some low intensity entertainment after a more demanding game. It also works as a good crossover game, it can easily be played with families and more casual players. We never played it with it's max player count of 12 but I imagine it would be a quite boisterous affair. If you don't mind the reflex based gameplay, Ligretto provides a fun experience and something a little different. Worth a try in my opinion. |
AuthorI play, I paint. Archives
March 2025
Categories
All
|