|
2nd July 2023 It's a Sunday and we're logged into Board Game Arena for an evening of gaming fun and distraction. Bring harmonious equilibrium to the world by seeking balance between the four elements, nature and spirits in the game Sagani. How is this achieved? By drafting and placing tiles of course, in this quite abstract game. Caveat: We've only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
There's a fairly minimal use of art in the game, mainly being the 'vessels' on the front of the tiles and elemental spirits on the back. It's perfectly adequate and gives Sagani a clean and uncluttered look that lends the game a bright and colourful appearance on the table when played. Iconography is also kept to a minimum here, consisting only of numbers and arrows. Players will not encounter any problems with iconography when playing Sagani. I will add that the 'arrows' are displayed 'thematically', which means red arrows look like flame and so on. I'm not a particular fan of this as it made the arrows look less like arrows. On to play Setup
On to play In Sagani, players will be drafting tiles into their personal playing area to create a display and also create objectives which will need to be completed. This is done by matching coloured arrows to their colour on other tiles. For the most part, Sagani uses the typical turn order with the active player acting before play progresses to the person their left. However, once in a while actions will occur in order of scoring position on the score tracker. In the active player's turn, the following actions are performed.
Endgame Play progress until the scoring threshold is reached on the score tracker, this is dependant on player count. Play then continues until all players have had equal turns. Score are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Sagani's theme is pretty thin and almost negligible. Elements and spirits? Tiles and arrows? It all feels a bit forced and if theme is important to you, then you may find Sagani a little unengaging. For me, it's not too much of an issue and didn't put me off the game. Mechanically, Sagani almost feels like more of a puzzle than a tile-laying game. It's all about the optimal placement of those tiles and putting down a tile that will match up the most arrows. Players will find themselves placing tiles in such a way that they will hope to get the right coloured tile later in the game. Sometimes it felt like an exercise in frustration, I found myself wanting to complete every tile and essentially solve the puzzle but in a game like this, that's never possible. This brings me to an interesting element of the mechanics; namely having a limited number of discs to place on tiles. It means that playing tiles - particularly the higher value tiles that might not be completed for while is a twofold risk, not only may the tile not get completed but it also ties up the disks, potentially forcing players to take cacophony discs. The penalties for taking a couple isn't too great but it's something to avoid if you can. This is balanced with how the higher value tiles genuinely offer more value. E.g. A 1VP tile requires 1 arrow to be resolved, earning 1VP 'per resolution'. A 10vp tile requires 4 arrows to be resolved, earning 2.5VP 'per resolution'. It means a 10VP tiles offer much better efficiency over any other tiles provided it can be completed. It's a good implementation of an element of risk/reward that forces players to consider short and long term goals. There's also a higher level of play that comes from watching other players and potentially drafting a tile they might need. Sagani is also pretty straightforward and accessible to non-gamers, the basic concept of pointing an arrow at its particular colour is easily understood, the only wrinkle being the intermezzo rules which are a touch fiddly but nothing close to a game breaker. However, while I feel that Sagani has solid gameplay, I also feel that the light rules that makes it accessible do mean it doesn't really stand out from the crowd for me. There are plenty of games that pretty much do what Sagani does just as well. I'd happily play Sagani if someone else wanted to but personally, I can't think why I'd choose it over any of the other good drafting and tile laying games. I do think that this would be a good introductory game to people unfamiliar with this style of game.
0 Comments
8th June 2023 Gaming night in Aldershot continues with Village Rails in what is described as 'A game of locomotives and local motives'. Although most of those motives appear to be planning holiday trips through the English countryside and probably to the south coast in this follow-up to the game Village Green. What's in the game?
Component quality is good throughout and there's nothing bad to write about. The cards are of the standard expected from a modern game and understandably smaller than usual which keeps the game's footprint from getting too large. The frames and coins are all made of sturdy card and also to the standard that is expected from a modern game. While made mostly of card, the score trackers are both a nice and useful addition, doing away with the need to use tokens to track what is a relatively high scoring game. The art direction in Village Rails is also for the most part good. It has a watercolour aesthetic that depicts the steam trains of old and bird's eye views of the games 5 different landscapes of yesteryear with nice little touches such as horses in pastures and buildings or patches of garden in villages. Unfortunately, the art does fall down a bit when depicting the differences between the lake and forest terrain types which should be obviously different but somehow, with a murky mixture of blue-green palettes can be conflated with each other. This brings me to the game's other problem with presentation; iconography. Village Rails has icons for the 5 different types of 'feature' which can be found on the train lines. It also has icons for the game's 5 different types of landscape but these symbols are tiny and can tricky to spot! Worse still, they can be lost against the noise of a landscape with a dark background. This is compounded by the fact that the cards are small. It's not a gamebreaker but it is a oversight that can add some unnecessary fiddliness to proceedings. Otherwise the iconography is pretty straightforward, easily understood and shouldn't prove too complicated. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Village Rails, players will be drafting track cards to create train lines within their frame in a 3x4 grid to score VPs, they can also draft trip cards to make those train lines earn even more VPs. Finally, they will be using terminus cards to earn money. Village rails plays over exactly 12 rounds and uses a typical turn order with the active player taking their actions before play progresses to the player on their left. In their turn, the active play performs the following actions.
Endgame Once all players have taken exactly 12 turns, the game is over. Each players now calculates VPs earned from sidings and adds it to their score tracker. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Thematically, Village Rails, especially with its artwork, harks back to an age of steam before the existence of personal transport when trains represented an opportunity to go on holiday to the coast or sightsee through the countryside. Mechanically, Village Rails is on recognisable ground. It's drafting and placement rules, will be familiar to many players, as will the coin-and-conveyor belt mechanic for replacing cards. The set-collecting, point soring mechanics will also be familiar. Sometimes players will want a set of the same landscape, or alternatively they'll want a variety of different ones on their line and so forth. Where Village Rails does differentiate itself is in the use of trip cards to add an extra layer of scoring opportunities to the proceedings. Players will now be looking to combo trip cards off the routes they are creating. E.g., a player may be creating a route with only a type of terrain and would look for a trip card that complements that objective. The game has a fairly wide variety of trips cards, including trip cards that score off of other trip cards. Interestingly, there are some trip cards that work well on short train lines. It's possible to create a train line with only 1 card that immediately goes out of the playing area and a trip card that requires only 1 type of terrain would score easily off of that line. Additionally, in the early game, Village Rails also has quite a harsh cash economy. Money is very useful for getting cards that a player needs but is in quite short supply at the start and players can soon run out of cash - and there's only 2 ways to get more - playing terminus cards after completing lines or drafting cards with coins on them. This presents an interesting dynamic to players: I imagine most players will instinctively want to create the longest most elaborate trains lines to increase their scoring opportunities. Sometimes though, it can be good to complete a line quickly to get an injection of funds which can prove beneficial in the late game. This adds a nice little balancing act to the game, creating short and long term needs. All of this provides players with more meaningful decisions to make and this is especially true since not only do players only have 12 turns until their playing area is filled. There will only ever be 7 train lines available to be completed, Players will need to optimise the placing of track cards I don't usually refer to other games when blogging about the current game but it's worth mentioning that Village Rails is a re-iteration of its predecessor Village Green's 3x4 card grid mechanic which Village Rails definitely improves upon. Where in Village Green a mistake meant leaving a gap in the grid, in Village Rails it means playing a card that scores less optimally. Mechanically the result may be identical but it makes Village Rails feels a little more forgiving, less frustrating and ultimately makes for a better game. I found Village Rails to be an enjoyable game of its type that squeezes quite a lot into a small package, providing players with interesting options and meaningful decisions to make, albeit with a slightly flawed presentation. If you like route-building games with some drafting elements and it's train travel theme, then its one to try. Finally; I would definitely recommend Village Rails over Village Green, there's nothing wrong with Village Green but this is the superior game. 30th May 2023 It's a Tuesday evening again and that means it's time for some gaming goodness with the Woking Gaming Club at The Sovereigns. Bandido is a wily one!. The sly criminal has finally been caught and sent to jail. But Bandido is never one to rest and soon has found a way to dig tunnels out of his cell. Can the players manage to coordinate in this cooperative card-laying game to stop Bandido escaping? What's in a game?
There's not much to say about Bandido's minimal components. The starting tile is notably thick and chunky in contrast to the cards which feel a touch flimsy - possibly due to their unusual proportion. This is not an issue though and unless the cards are mistreated they will be fine. Bandido's artwork is equally minimal, there's a touch of stylised art for Bandido himself and well.... that's pretty much it other than the illustration representing dead-ends and the tunnels themselves. You could argue that the hand holding the flashlight is an icon, otherwise there's no iconography in the game. Everything is instantly understandable. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Bandido, players are cooperatively trying to stop Bandido from escaping by playing cards to block off all tunnels. The game uses a traditional turn order with the active player resolving their turn before play progresses to the player on their left. A turn plays out as detailed below.
Endgame Play continues until 1 of the 2 following conditions are met. If the deck becomes depleted and none of the players have any cards left to play and there is at least 1 un-blocked off tunnel, then Bandido manages to escape! The player collectively lose. If on the other hand, the players manage to block off all tunnels at any point during the game, then Bandido is trapped. The players immediately and collectively win! Overall
Bandido's theme is sort of stuck-on and perhaps a little offbeat (I mean stopping the titular character escaping!) but it fits the game well enough and will be understood by all players. Whilst the game's rules light, don't be fooled by this simplicity. Bandido is quite a hard game to win. This is especially true when playing at a higher player count. In a solo game, the player will know exactly which cards are available but with 3 companions, it becomes much harder to predict. (One criticism I have of Bandido is that as the tunnel network invariably grows, it may expand in unexpected ways - more than once we've had to shift the entire map because it was going off a table edge - which is a fairly fiddly affair.) There is without a doubt also a degree of luck involved (As is the case with most cooperative games.) which may not appeal to all players but there's also a good chunk of having to think ahead and trying optimise how cards are played. It's hard to resist the urge to play dead-end cards that close tunnels down in the early game but it can be vital that you don't always do this. Management of 'moving' tunnels around the playing area is key to success. E.g., directing tunnels towards each other and connecting them can create 'loops' which essentially closes both. Additionally looping 2 tunnels into 1 then closing it off is equally useful. There are only a limited amount of dead-end cards and using them up too early means they won't be available to use in the late game. It's something players must plan for. Players must also make sure they don't create any situations with card positioning which will render a tunnel impossible to close. Because Bandido is so straightforward, with a easily recognisable goal and accessibility, it's a great game for all the family, more causal players and younger players and can prove a lot of fun. That this is a cooperative game is even better, many cooperative games have intricate systems that must be managed in order to make them work, which not the case here. It's definitely worth trying. 5th February 2023 It's another Sunday evening and we're logged into Board Game Arena again for some gaming fun. Nova Luna; the new moon. No, this is no a game based on those dodgy vampire films. It's a pretty standard draft and tile placement game. Caveat: We've only ever played this game digitally. What's in a game?
The game's only art is found on the moon wheel, there's some fairly detailed styling around the wheel as well all the faces of the moon. Otherwise, Nova Luna is fairly light on artwork. It does make good use of bold bright colours however, which I like and think makes it look eye catching. If you understand numbers and coloured dots, then you'll understand Nova Luna's iconography. It's very straightforward and easily understood. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Nova Luna, players will be drafting tiles from the moon wheel and placing them adjacent to each other in their personal play area with the intent of connecting tiles of certain colours to each other in order to complete the objectives or tasks on those tiles. Nova Luna does not use a traditional turn order, player order is based on the respective position of each player's token position on the moon track. Furthermore, whenever a player takes a tile, their token will move along the track.
Endgame There are 2 ways the game can end.
Overall
Nova Luna's new moon/lunar theme is a bit left field and in fact, the rulebook actually describes Nova Luna as an abstract game. However, abstract nature aside, let's discuss the gameplay. Nova Luna presents two elements that player will need to think about, which are the drafting and then placement of tiles. The drafting element presents players with some potentially interesting choices. Taking a tile will likely alter the active player's position in the turn order. They will generally have the option of taking 1 of 3 the tiles ahead of the moon meeple. When the situation occurs that there are less than 3 they can elect to fill the spaces but may choose not to, instead selecting from the smaller selection if those tiles are what they want. Players can sometimes manipulate the situation to get more tiles they need as there may be times when the active player could take a tile with a low time value and immediately act again, however, what's to stop a player always doing that? Well, tiles with low time values tend to have tasks that are harder to complete and require more connections. So there's a bit of a balancing mechanic there. Tile placement is also very important. It's vital to try and think ahead when doing this Optimal tile placement is key. Players will want to position tiles so that they complete current tasks but also leaves tile edges open to complete tasks later in the game or open to be connected to other tiles later on. Like a lot of games of this type. It will be tricky to always place the tile you want, when you want and they'll be moments of frustration when this occurs. Sometimes players will to adapt or change tactic. While I feel that Nova Luna is a game that plays well and I'd have no problems joining a game if someone wanted to play. It is however, also the kind of game I've played a lot before. The whole draft and place tile gameplay is something that's already been done quite a lot and while some of the mechanics utilised for this in Nova Luna are unique, I don't think it's enough to differentiate itself from other games of its type. If you've played games similar in gameplay to Nova Luna, you probably won't find much in here that's new. However, if you're new to this kind of game or looking for a game in this style, then Nova Luna is equally worth considering, it's not particularly difficult to learn and gives players meaningful decisions and choices to balance in a bright and colour package. 11th November 2022 It's a Friday and I'm at the office in Woking for some end-of-week gaming fun. You know you can't go wrong when you're playing a board game set in Renaissance Italy. In this case it's Florence and about princes which is about as Renaissance as it gets! All you need are some Medici and Borgia to round it all off! In The Princes of Florence players take on the role of wealthy nobles trying to out do each other by enticing artist and scholars to their estates to create 'works' which in turn gives players bragging rights - which is what is important obviously. What's in a game?
All the components in The Princes of Florence are well made. The tokens and cards are what you'd expect. The tetramino tiles feel nice and sturdy, as do the game and player boards. Amusingly, the pawns are all wearing wide-brimmed hats, got to have some protection from that scorching Mediterranean sun! Broadly speaking there there are 2 art styles utilised in The Princes of Florence. Tiles, tokens and some of the player boards are decorated with full colour illustrations. They are quite stylised and almost simplistic illustrations but they are effective and feel appropriate for the setting. All the game's cards (Particularly the profession cards.) are illustrated with a sepia coloured line art style. It contrasts with the art style but also compliments it and again, is appropriate for the setting. The standout art-wise is the game board where nearly each space on the scoring track has its own unique illustration. It shows that little extra effort put into the presentation that shows care for the game which I appreciate. There's little in the way of iconography, mostly its appears on the player boards in the form of silhouetted tetramino shapes for buildings but even so, they are also labelled. Most information is relayed through text. Speaking of which... The game uses a distinct and flowery font for text. It looks suitable for a renaissance themed game but can be a little harder to read than it could be and also tends to make the player board and cards a little more complex then they actually are. It's a minor quibble and in no way a gamebreaker though. How's it play? Setup
On to play The Princes of Florence is played over 7 rounds. Each round is divided into an auctioning phase and an action phase. Auctions allow players to bid for items which will aid them during action phases. The action phase uses the usual turn structure with the active player taking their turn before play progresses to the player on their left.
Endgame Once the 7th round has been completed, the game goes to scoring. Players now reveal any prestige cards they've acquired and score them, adding whatever they're worth to their score on the game board. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
In terms of gameplay, there's some nice mechanics going on. There's some interesting balancing that occurs with buildings. By virtue of their sizes, the larger buildings will be harder to fit in the grid and take up more room but they are wanted by more professions. Auctioning in particular is also well balanced. Because a player can only win 1 auction per round, it means someone who has a lot of cash cannot dominate all the proceedings. It means that every player can only ever get 1 object per round and it means that if a player has lost every auction and is the last player left in it, they can get any remaining object, unopposed and for just the cost of the opening bid. During the action phase, synchronicity is important. Getting landscapes, buildings, freedoms and professions that 'riff' off each is very useful. E.g., both the goldsmith and bell maker want a 'workshop, or both the theologian and painter want freedom of travel. Players will be looking to optimise their decisions especially when it comes to creating works which is a major source of income and potentially PPs. Why is this so important? The Princes of Florence only has 7 rounds, which is only 7 auctions and 14 actions! Even the most efficient of players will probably find themselves unable to do everything they want they want to do in the rounds given. This forces them to make difficult decisions which is generally a good thing. The Princes of Florence also has distinct early and late game states. Early on players will be looking to build up their estate, buildings, freedoms etc. In the late game they will likely be looking to create as many works as possible and convert them to PPs. If a player creates 2 works in a round, only the highest value one counts for end of round best work bonus but both will pay out Florins and consequently PPs. I suppose that The Princes of Florence is a sort of 'mid-weight' game and by that I mean a game that isn't too complex but probably has a bit too much going on to be a good introductory or crossover game. With having to win auctions to gain certain objects and cards, buildings to place, works to create and more, as well as having to consider how everything relates to everything else, there's a lot to think about. But for more seasoned players, The Princes of Florence is a solid experience with well structured gameplay elements that all have a clear purpose which in turn presents players with meaningful decisions to make. It also blends the individual aspect of a player building up their own palazzo and estate with the interaction of auctioning and drafting. The Princes of Florence is definitely one to try. 11th August 2022 Thursday is here again and we're in Aldershot for more gaming goodness. Do you like dungeons (Of the D&D kind of course...)? Do you like interior decoration? Well now you can channel your inner malevolent Changing Rooms desires in this tile laying game of stylish dungeon creation for your fiendish and and most definitely picky overlord! What's in a game?
Component quality is good throughout Dungeon Decorators as you'd expect from any modern game. The tiles and tokens are all suitable sturdy as the cards, nothing bad here but nothing standout either. The wooden cubes are a welcome addition and the traditional playing pawns are plastic - and that's fine, although to be honest they feel like a bit of left-field choice but they're also relatively big and practical, so that's good. Most of the game's art appears on the player boards and cards, particularly the boss cards but it even carries over to some of the tokens. With bright and cartoony character art, it conveys the game's humorous theme and it's an appealing style. Artwork for the corridors, junctions and rooms is straightforward but always practical. There's quite a few icons to Dungeon Decorators though and players will need to learn them. This is most apparent with the decoration side of the dungeon tiles where there's the 'double-whammy' of not only having to learn what the various icons represent, but what their positioning in relation to each other means. It's a bit fiddly and belies the games light theme and rules and will probably require referring to the rules. How's it player? Setup
On to play The objective in Dungeon Decorators is to create a dungeon in certain shapes as well as adding decorations to the dungeon in certain positions. What these shapes and positions will be is determined by the 2 boss cards which will apply to all players and by individual goal cards players have hidden in their hands. During each round, the active player's turn is split into 5 phases. Dungeon Decorators does not follow the usual turn structure, once the active player has completed their actions, play does not progress to the player on their left, instead the next player is determined by whose pawn is next in line on the draft board. The following occurs in a round:
Endgame There are 2 ways the game can end. If the 3rd and final hourglass is drawn from the red bag when refilling the spaces on the draft board, then the game immediately ends. If the final hourglass is drawn during an action, such as placing a pawn in the middle space on the draft board our using a burrow bro action, then the current round is played out and the game ends with players having had even turns. There are a variety of ways to score VPs.
Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
No doubt about it, Dungeon Decorators has a quirky theme along with quirky presentation to go with it. At it's heart though, it's a pretty straightforward game of it's type, draft a tile and play it into a expanding network of tiles to maximise connections, albeit with a couple of nice little innovative touches in the form tile flipping and personal scoring opportunities, which I'll talk about below. As is typical of this kind of game, players will need to position tiles in order to optimise the points they will score. Talking of scoring, Dungeon Decorators provides 2 clear routes to scoring points; how a dungeon is shaped and how decorations are placed which brings to me to the double-sided tiles. When placing a tile, players will need to choose which side to use and this will be heavily contextual. Players will need to take into consideration what tiles they already have in play as well as their personal goal cards and global scoring cards. Unlike most tile-laying games, there's no connection between different scoring opportunities on the tiles, that is shape and decoration scoring is completely separate to each other with no way to place a tile to score both, it's one or the other. Yet, they also rely on each other or at least decoration tiles rely upon their presence of walls to be placed against. This means players will need to think, how can they can place a dungeon shape that allows me to play decorations. Personal goal cards are also an interesting addition. Firstly, they add some asymmetrical scoring opportunities which will lead to player adopting different approaches to what they prioritise and essentially some asymmetrical tactics. Secondly, they provide players with some flexibility when deciding how to prioritise certain elements of the game. E.g., a when scoring goal cards, a player can choose to only draw shape goal cards and concentrate on playing dungeon tiles over decorations. However, even with these 2 innovative mechanics, I feel that Dungeon Decorators fails to stand out of the crowd. For me it doesn't feel different enough to other games of s similar type. It's a perfectly acceptable game with solid core gameplay that provides an entertaining experience and I would happily play this if someone else wanted to but there are other games I would personally choose over Dungeon Decorators. If you're a big fan of drafting, tile laying games and want to try something familiar but a fresh twist on the mechanics or the fun theme tickles your fancy, then you may want to give this a look-in. 4th August 2022 It's a Thursday and we're round Simon's for a evening of gaming entertainment. Cascadia: 'A land of falling waters,' generally referring to a large wilderness area in the Pacific north-west of the USA. In Cascadia players vie to create a diverse landscape of habitats and wildlife in this tile placement game. What's in a game?
For the most part the components are all high quality. The tiles and tokens are sturdy and the wildlife tokens in particular are chunky and tactile. The pinecone tokens are average quality by modern standard - which means perfectly acceptable. The same is true of the cards, they feel a little flimsy but since they're only used to display information and won't really be handled much, they too are perfectly acceptable. The art used on cards is fantastic, having said that, each set of 4 only uses 2 images which are flipped and used a 2nd time, it's a minor quibble but it feels touch cheap. Art on the tiles is good too but is hard to appreciate since they are relatively small. Importantly, it's also uncluttered, differences between habitats is for the most part very easy to distinguish. Similarly, the wildlife icons are easy seen. As a minor aside: Prairies are depicted as yellow, which I guess represent dry grasslands. The yellow definitely does not represent desert! And yes; some of the yellow tiles have salmon icons on them, because, believe it or not, prairies can have water features. If you ever play the game and someone says, 'why are their fish in the desert', then let them know!! Anyway, back to talking about components. The iconography is easily understood in Cascadia. It's obvious what the wildlife icons represent and the icon for pinecones is equally as obvious. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Cascadia, players will draft tiles and wildlife tokens, using them to create a personal landscape by placing tiles adjacent to each other and putting tokens on top of them in order to create habitats and patterns of animals to score points. Cascadia follows a usual turn order with the active player resolving their action before play progresses to their left.
Endgame Play continues until all the face-down stacks of tiles have been depleted and only 3 tiles remain in the drafting area, which should also be a even number of player turns. VPs are scored from several sources.
Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
The rulebook for Cascadia talks about the real life habitats and biomes that inspired the game and it's obvious that this is one of those games where a bit of extra attention has been put into the details. On to the game itself: Cascadia has a nice mixture of quick to learn rules and depth of gameplay. This depth comes from forcing players to make tricky and meaningful decisions. This occurs because Cascadia has 3 axis' of play which will influence players' choices. The first comes from wanting tiles with specific habitats on them; players may want to expand their forests or rivers for example and will be looking for tiles that facilitate that. The second axis comes from also wanting tiles with specific wildlife icons. If a player needs a fox token in a certain spot, then they'll need a tile with a fox icon. The third and final axis comes from getting the actual wildlife tokens that are needed to score the wildlife cards. All of this means that it's unlikely that players will get all 3 that they want when picking a single pair which would be a no-brainer, they'll probably end getting 2 of they want and sometimes only 1. Players will need to adapt and re-strategize contextually, look to optimise their picks and finding other scoring opportunities. Players will probably have to gamble a little bit on getting what they need later in the game. Pinecone tokens can of course change things. Used at the right time they can really open up a player's choices, getting any pair can make a difference, as can clearing all wildlife tokens in the drafting area if a player is really looking for a certain token. Cascadia also has a fairly quick playtime, although it sort of occupies a game length that's way too long to be a filler but a little too short to fill an entire evening. I don't consider that a bad thing, you could just play twice! The randomness in setup and scoring gives it a lot of replayability. If I had a criticism of Cascadia, it would be that sometimes the card scoring can be a little unclear and finicky. The rulebook does offer elaborations on this, but it's a definite little niggle. Otherwise though, I think Cascadia is ab excellent tile-laying and set collectiing game. For me it ticks a lot of boxes that good games should; straightforward rules, some depth for decision making and a brisk playtime. It's one of those games I frequently like to carry in my board game bag when going to game events, so if I meet someone who's never met played Cascadia, they can try it. As should you! 31st July 2022 It's a Sunday night and we're logged into Board Game Arena for a evening of gaming entertainment. Chrome: A reference to colour (Not the browser!). Ino: The last syllable of 'domino'. Chromino: Colour domino! And that's exactly what Chromino is - dominos with colours instead of numbers. Caveat: We've only ever played Chromino digitally. What's in the game?
There's very little to be said about the components here. No artwork is used, only 5 colours: blue, green, purple, red and yellow. These are bright plain colours too with no symbology to help colour blind players distinguish between them, which seems like a bit of a omission by today's standards. Only 1 icon is used in Chrominos - which is the 'wild' symbol that always appears on a white background in the centre space. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Chromino, players take turns playing tiles from their hand with the intention of emptying their hand first and thus winning. On their turn, the active player will perform 1 of the following actions.
Endgame When a player has only 1 tile remaining in their hand, they must shout "Uno!", or more sensibly just announce this is their last tile to all other players and then turn that last tile face-up for all to see. Play then continues normally. A new rule is introduced when a player has a only 1 tile left; which is that the last tile a player puts down cannot be a wild tile. If this would be the case, they must draw a new one instead. Then, when a player places their final tile, the current round is concluded and any players who have placed all their tiles are declared winners. Overall
From the brevity of the rules description, it's apparent that Chromino is a light game, which is no bad thing, it makes the game easy to learn and accessible to non gamers. It is after all, dominoes. For me though, this level of simplicity makes the game unengaging. I know there's a touch of strategy to be found from watching other players, possibly seeing which colours they're having trouble matching and trying to put those colours out to stymy them. Also, when a player reveals their last tile, opponents will get an idea on how to block it but truth be told, it will also rely on luck to use these strategies. This brings me to my main issue with the game: It's just very heavily dependent on luck more than anything else. They'll be times when someone won't be able to play anything and will just have add a tile to their hand. This becomes even more frustrating when you watch an opponent then play a tile, this now means there's now a 2-tile difference between you and them - which in Chromino can be quite a lot. And this seemed borne out in play. Often there would be a player - who through no fault of their own would have 2 or 3 more tiles than their opponents. Usually it meant they would never be in the running to win. So unengaging and frustrating is how I would summarise Chromino. I'm not sure who would like it, fans of heavier games will shy away from this and more casual players will probably gravitate to more traditional games. However, if you want a lightweight game a bit like dominoes... well you could just play dominoes. 23rd June 2022 It's another Thursday evening and we're in Aldershot for another gaming night. Village Green - a local game for local people? It turns out that competitions between local villages to have the best village green can be serious business! What's in a game?
Well that's it for the components - a deck of cards. The card quality average and what you'd expect from games nowadays. Watercolour styled artwork is used throughout the game on the green and village cards. depicting various items that could be found on an English village green (SIC). It's a pleasant style and the artwork all looks appropriately good, fitting it's theme quite nicely. The iconography is not so well implemented though. I felt the symbols used for the different types of flower could have been a bit more distinct or individual, especially since the icons are quite small. I also felt the 3 different types of tree icon displayed on the bottom of the green cards and award cards could have had been more distinctive. Otherwise, the iconography is fine. How's it play? Set up
On to play The objective in Village Green is to construct a tableau of 3x3 green cards while on the 'outside' of this 3x3 grid create a row and column of award cards to score points off of the green cards. Thus creating an overall 4x4 grid - including the village card which will be in the top-left corner. Village Green uses the usual turn structure of having the active player complete their action then having play progress to the player on their left. The active player can take 1 of the following 2 actions.
Endgame There are 3 criteria which may end the game. If either the green card or award card deck is depleted, or a player has placed 9 green cards, then the end has been triggered. The current is completed and the game goes to scoring. Player score from the following sources: A face-up village card scored 1 VP Each visible pond scores 2 VPs. Award cards score all the (Up to 3.) cards in their respective row/column. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
On a basic level, Village Green is a fair simple game - pick a card and play a card, which makes it straightforward and quick to understand. However, like all good games, it's easy to learn but hard to master and this is definitely the case with this game. What makes Village Green tricky is having to literally think 2 steps ahead. Players will need to pay attention to a green card's type and colour when playing it because it will influence what is played next to it. Not only is positioning important when playing a green card but the order in which they are played will matter too. E.g., putting a green card into the centre of the 3x3 grid means that all 4 orthogonally adjacent cards placed subsequently must match the flower type and colour for that card. If the centre card is played last, then it would have to match all 4 cards already played and that requires planning ahead. Matching 3 types and 3 colours might not seem difficult but remember, players will only have a hand of 3 green cards and a row of 3 cards to draft from. Sure, a player can keep drawing and discarding green cards to hopefully get what they need, but this can catch a player out. Once the deck is gone - it's game over. Additionally, while rinsing through green cards, other players may be completing their 3x3 grids, which is also game over. Ultimately, players will need to commit to taking some risks and play early cards with gaps between them for some wriggle room for placing later cards and also rely on a bit of luck to get what they need. Award cards are also tricky to manage but in a different way. Players start with three, which can be good as it gives each player a initial individual scoring target to aim for. However, as green cards get played and players may be forced to put them in certain positions thanks to type and colour, it may end up that a award card scores less, zero or even worse - negative VPs! Luckily, award cards can be nullified by covering them with other award cards later. This though raises another quandary for players to ponder. The later an award card is played in the game, the harder it will be to place in a way to maximise it's scoring potential. Finally, there's some potential for higher level play by watching what cards other players are putting down, trying to anticipate their actions and denying them what they need. Although, since some of the icons are so small, it can be physically tricky looking at other players' tableaus with leaning over them! All of these mechanics are good because they always provide players with meaningful decisions as they try and positions cards so that they match type and colour as well as scoring criteria. Having written all of that brings me to a drawback of the game, which is that it can be a harsh and unforgiving experience. Players will be frustrated when unable to play cards and are instead forced to discard. It's likely that some players will end up without all their possible green or award cards - I know I did on my first play. So despite being easy to learn, I'm not sure this is a game for more 'casual players'? If it 'groks' with them, they'll be fine. Otherwise it'll probably take a game or two to get handle on where to player cards. There's not denying it's a elegant, fairly engaging game. It plays quick enough and will provide players the challenge of being able to place all their cards and also optimise scoring opportunities. Definitely worth a try in my opinion. 12th June 2022 Sunday evening is here and we're logged into Board Game Arena for a night of gaming. Does a bear lay tiles in the woods, who knows? What I can tell you is that a bear definitely does lay tiles in the park thanks to Barenpark: A tile laying game about building a park for bears and bears only! Caveat: we've only ever played Barenpark digitally. What's in a game?
Barenpark's art is fairly minimal but effective. It's nothing to write home about but is perfectly functional. Tiles display artwork themed to their type, so the green tiles feature a portaloo for a toilet, a playground for a play ground and so on. The white and green tiles show buildings and habitats pertinent to the type of bear they represent. E.g., the polar tiles appear glacial. There are only a few icons in the game and they are easily learnt. They are also colour coded, thus the wheelbarrow icon - which is green - represents green tiles, thus white cement trucks are for white tiles and orange excavators are for orange. The work crew icon represents construction crews which is not related to tiles. One slight criticism here is that while there are green, white and orange tiles, some tiles which are coloured green will actually be white or orange tiles, there are also some glacial blue tiles which are actually orange. It's a minor quibble, but players will need to remember that a tile's colour is based on its scoring icon. This could have been improved by using unique colours. How's it play? Setup
On to play In Barenpark, players complete to create the best bear park ever. Players achieve this by placing tiles on to their boards which in turn allows them to draft more tiles and boards. Barenpark uses a traditional turn structure with the active player taking their turn before play progress to the player on their left. During the active player's turn, they must perform the following actions.
Endgame When any player completes their 4th game board, that is; collects their 4th bear statue, then the endgame is triggered. All other players now have one more turn of play and then the game goes to scoring. Players add together the value of all tiles played and bear statues placed on their game boards. Points are tallied, highest score wins. Overall
Barenpark is a smart blend between easily understood, accessible rules, meaningful decisions and optimising gameplay. The game is something of a race to get the highest scoring tiles and bear statue tokens first and this can put players in something of quandary. For the most part, players will want to draft white and orange tiles as often as possible because they score the points. They also cover more of the board and thus potentially draft more tiles. This is particularly true of orange tiles. It means that players should be looking to cover icons with their tiles placements as effectively as possible to gain more tiles. Using an entire turn just to gain a green tile is not particularly efficient. Having said that, greens are not bad tiles, sometimes getting green tiles is a useful move, those 1-space portaloos can fill in pesky gaps on a board, working towards getting bear statues. Talking of bear statue tokens. Sometimes it's worth taking a less efficient tile just to complete a board and gain a higher scoring token before another player. This is all of course contextual and dependant on the situation. There's definitely a small degree of higher level of play going on here that comes from watching other players turns and trying to anticipate their next moves. With limited numbers of white and orange tiles, knowing which tile another player might go for gives you the option of employing a denial strategy against them or beating them to the punch for a token. This brings me to the one criticism I have. When playing Barenpark in some circumstances it sometimes felt like that if one player got 'ahead' they tended to stay ahead. By ahead I mean managing to fill spaces on the board before other players. This is most apparent when drafting bear statue tokens. At times you can see that a player will complete one of their boards before you and claiming the better scoring token, then they'll also be ahead for the next board and claiming the token ahead of you again. Of course it's possible to re-prioritise and change which board you're trying to complete but since Barenpark has fairly linear gameplay (By which I mean you can only expand you tiles into areas where you already have tiles.), this can be tricky, although the endgame rules where players get an extra turn after whoever finished it probably goes some way to alleviating this. I think Barenpark is a good, if unremarkable game that feels a little 'bland' or functional and is a little on the light side of this style of tile-placement game but I don't see that bad thing. But quibbles aside, if you want a solid, tile-placing game that's not-too taxing but still engaging, Barenpark is a good choice. Barenpark's accessibility and 'lightness' means means it's a good choice for a gateway or entry game. |
AuthorI play, I paint. Categories
All
Archives
February 2026
|